Talent Management - Challenges
In today’s rapidly moving, extremely uncertain, and highly competitive global environment, firms worldwide are encountering numerous global talent challenges (Schuler et al., 2011). Global talent challenges are significant (strategic and high impact) HR-embedded business issues that focus on managing a firm to ensure just the right amount of the right talent and motivation, at the right place, at the right price, during all economic and financial ups and downs in a very competitive world for the purposes of balancing the workforce with the needs of the firm in the short term, and positioning the firm to have the workforce needed in the long term (Schuler et al., 2011).
Talent management is a recent, practitioner-generated term covering
a range of long-standing practices that aim at getting the right person in the
right job at the right time and these include workforce planning, succession
planning, employee development, and career management (Cappelli and Keller 2014).
The phrase dates from a 1998McKinsey report (Chambers et al. 1998), which
argued that variations in the performance of executives explain a great deal of
the variance in overall performance across businesses. It has become the
dominant human capital topic of the early twenty-first century (Cascio &
Aguinis 2008a).
The challenges associated with managing talent in modern labor
markets are a constant source of discussion among academics and practitioners,
but the literature on the subject is sparse and has grown somewhat haphazardly
(Cappelli and Keller 2014).
In today’s rapidly moving, extremely uncertain, and highly
competitive global environment, firms worldwide are encountering numerous
global talent challenges. Global talent challenges are significant (strategic
and high impact) HR-embedded business issues that focus on managing a firm to
ensure just the right amount of the right talent and motivation, at the right
place, at the right price, during all economic and financial ups and downs in a
very competitive world for the purposes of balancing the workforce with the
needs of the firm in the short term, and positioning the firm to have the
workforce needed in the long term (Schuler et al., 2011). Global talent
challenges emerge in the context of a dynamic environment. Among the many
factors that shape the specific challenges and responses of particular firms
are: (a) globalization, (b) changing demographics, (c) demand for workers with
needed competencies and motivation, and (d) the supply of those needed
competencies and motivation (Beechler & Woodward, 2009; Scullion &
Collings, 2011).
Figure 1: Shows the Framework for Global
Talent Challenges and Global Talent Management Initiatives
Source: R.S. Schuler et al. / Journal of World Business 46 (2011) 506–516
Despite the growing practice of outside hiring, most organizations
still think of talent management as being about current employees, which is
right at the traditional practices context which forms the core of talent
management practices are aimed at existing employees, and despite the attention
in the literature to strategic jobs, many of the major concerns in the practice
of talent management have to do with identifying individuals for development
and future advancement. (Cappelli and Keller 2014).
Although most of the attention in talent management has been on
internal talent, the focus in practice and increasingly of new research has
disproportionately been on outside talent, the growing reliance on external
hiring has led to a burgeoning literature on inter-organizational mobility in
management, albeit outside of the traditional HR field, however, the
institutions that support external labor market strategies have also received
attention (Cappelli and Keller 2014). The actions that firms can take to
influence the quantity and quality of external applicants have been documented
in recent reviews of the external recruiting literature (Bonet et al. 2013,
Breaugh 2013, Dineen & Soltis 2011).
Several barriers to the use of HR policies and practices for global
talent management have been identified, and many of these barriers to
successful GTM initiatives exist for domestic firms, but they become more
complex and difficult to overcome in global firms, including: (1) The fact that
senior managers do not spend enough time on talent management, perhaps thinking
that there are other more pressing things (e.g., finance, market share, product
attributes) to be concerned with; (2) Organizational structures, whether based
regions, products, or functions, that inhibit collaboration and the sharing of
resources across boundaries; (3) Middle and frontline managers who are not
sufficiently involved in or responsible for employees’ careers, perhaps because
they see these activities as less important than managing the business, and/ or
because they require such a long-term perspective; (4) Managers are
uncomfortable and/or unwilling to acknowledge performance differences among
employees—a step that is required in order to take actions to improve
performance; (5) Managers at all levels who are not sufficiently involved in
the formulation of the firm’s talent management strategy, and therefore, have a
limited sense of ownership and understanding of actions designed to help manage
the firm’s global talent; (6) HR departments that lack the competencies needed
to address the global talent challenges effectively, and/or lack the respect of
other executives whose cooperation is needed to implement appropriate HR
policies and practices; and (7) There exists a ‘‘knowledge-doing’’ gap that
prevents from managers implementing actions, even though they might know that
they are the right things to do (Pfeffer & Sutton, 2006).
While there are many barriers to overcome, multinational firms such
as IBM, HSBC, P&G, Novartis, ThyssenKrupp, and Schlumberger have shown that
success is possible with the commitment, leadership and involvement of the top
management (Farndale et al., 2010; Lane & Pollner, 2008; Palmisano, 2007).
List of references:
Beechler, S., & Woodward, I. C. (2009). Global talent
management. Journal of International Management, 15: 273–285.
Bonet R, Cappelli P, Hamori M. 2013. Labor market intermediaries
and the new paradigm for human resources. Acad. Manag. Ann. 7(1):341–92
Breaugh JA. 2013. Employee recruitment. Annu. Rev. Psychol.
64:389–416
Cappelli, P. and Keller, J.R., 2014.
Talent management: Conceptual approaches and practical challenges. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), pp.305-331.
Cascio WF, Aguinis H. 2008a. Research in industrial and
organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: changes, choices, and trends. J.
Appl. Psychol. 93(5):1062–81
Chambers EG, Foulon M, Handfield-Jones H, Hankin SM, Michaels EG
III. 1998. The war for talent. McKinsey Q. 3:44–57
Farndale, E., Scullion, H., & Sparrow, P. (2010). The role of
the corporate HR function in global talent management. Journal of World
Business, 46: 161–168.
Guthridge, M., Komm, A. B., & Lawson, E. (2008). Making talent
management a strategic priority. The McKinsey Quarterly, January: 49–59.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous
half-truths, and total nonsense: profiting from evidence-based management.
Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Schuler, R. S., Jackson, S. E., & Tarique, I. (2011). Framework
for global talent challenges: HR actions of global talent management. In
Scullion, H. and Collings, D. (Eds) Global Talent Mangement. London: Routledge.
Schuler, R.S., Jackson, S.E. and
Tarique, I., 2011. Global talent management and global talent challenges:
Strategic opportunities for IHRM. Journal of world business, 46(4), pp.506-516.

One main challenge of calibrating talent management practices and programs to attract and engage our young entrants is critically important to all firms and particularly so for firms that depend on a strong flow of top talent, hence making the business infrastructure more attractive to Gen Y is a high priority (Ericsson, 2018).
ReplyDeleteAgreed. While the populations of many developed economies are aging and shrinking in size, the populations of developing and emerging economies are expanding and getting younger (Strack et al., 2008). However, Paine (2006) argues that there is therefore a strong
Deleteneed to further study the differences in rewards, development and training needs, leadership styles, and motivation of different generations, as well as across other diverse groups of employees.
Agreed, also according to M., Boselie, P., & Fruytier, B. (2013) disclose major challenge faced by talent management as per literature is putting Talent Management process to operation and achieving desired outcome
ReplyDeleteYes Gajendran. Some employers say no to Gen Y, while others are enjoying the challenges of the latest generation of workers. Companies are on the extremes of denial versus acceptance, excitement versus dread, opportunity versus threat. But it is generally agreed that it is the generation that will transform the way business is carried out for many generations in future (Jindal and Shaikh, 2017).
Delete